The ongoing Pharmacotherapy for ministration of Covid 19 disease: A Review

 

Akshada G. Waghchaure*, Dattaprasad N. Vikhe, Ravindra S. Jadhav, Ganesh S. Shinde

Department of Pharmacognosy, Pravara Rural College of Pharmacy,

Pravaranagar, Ahmednagar, Maharashtra -413736.

*Corresponding Author E-mail: akshadawaghchaure2@gmail.com

 

Abstract:

A completely unique coronavirus (2019-n Cov) formally reffered to as severe acute respiratory syndromes [SARS Cov 2] appeared in wuhan, china. The coronavirus infectious disease 2019 (covid 19) has speechless like a shock in fully unprepared world. Covid 19 caused by the novel severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS Cov 2). Covid 19 first emerged in December 2019 all in cluster of patients with the pneumonia of unknown cause was recognized in Wuhan, China. In july 2020, SARS Cov2 was affected more than 200 countries. The coronavirus fevered 79% and 50% genomic similarities with severe acute respiratory syndromes coronavirus 2 [SARS Cov 2] and middle east respiratory syndromes coronavirus [MERS Cov 2] respectively. Several drugs have been investigated for their efficacy and safety in the treatment of covid 19 disease like antiviral, antimalerials, antibiotics immunomodulators, anticoagulants.

 

KEYWORDS: SARS-COV-19, MERS COV2, Outbreak, Pharmacotherapy, Antivirals, Antibiotics, Natural herbs, Herbal remedies.

 

 


INTRODUCTION:

On the date of March 11, 2020, the world health organizations announced that covid 19 was a global pandemic indicating significant global spread of an infectious disease1,2. The covid 19 disease caused by pathogen nobel coronavirus (2019 nCov) which described by the International Committee on Taxonomy of viruses as the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS Cov2). The novel coronavirus born in Wuhan,China and has dessiminated worldwide. The disease was declared as corona virus disease 2019 (covid 19) by world health organization on date of 11 Feb3.

 

The etiology of the SARS Cov 2 is not clearly identified but somewhat similar as severe acute respiratory syndromes coronavirus (SARS Cov).4 The replication of virus and its components result into in vigourous inflammation and causes acute lung disorder. The high risk study of SARS Cov2 determined the fatality is uncontrolled pulmonary inflammation.5

 

The novel coronavirus is the new strain that not found previously in humans. These virus get named as the from the way they look under microscope.6 The coronavirus involve core of genetic material surrounded by envelope with protein spike, that gives appearance of a crown, it means in latin word corona means crown.7

 

Peoples with covid19 has wide range of symotoms reported ranging from mild to severe illness. The coronavirus causes illness like respiratory disease. The respiratory disease ranges from common cold to more severe disease like Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus8

 

(MERS Cov) and severe acute respiratory syndrome corona virus (SARS Cov). The most of the covid 19 infected people feel little bit unwell, they will have a fever, they may have a cough and sore throat and sneeze9. In some individuals, they may have a gastrointestinal problem like vomiting and dirrhoea, but they lead to be more mild and even most children tend to have asymptomatic infections which means they don’t have any symptoms at all. Some individuals also have symptoms like to decrease sense og smell and taste.10

 

The coronavirus is single stranded RNA virus belongs to family coronaviridae, of the order of Niroviridae. In that four type of subfamily are involved: α, β, δ, γ which causes mild to severe respiratory tract disease. Coronavirus disease transmission occurred between the animals and humans, hence it is called as zoootic. Some research study declared that SARS Cov transmitted from civet cat to humans and a MERS Cov was transmitted through dromrdary camels to humans. The proper cause of SARSCov2 not found yet but research are ongoing to investigate the zoonotic source to outbreak. There four structural protein involved in novel coronavirus: spike (S), membrane (M), envelope (E), nucleocapsid (N). Primarily the S protein in coronavirus responsible for entery of viral component into host cell by attachment of S protein to host cell. S Protein divided into two subunits that is S1 and S2, by action of host protease.11 S1 Protein play important role in host cell binding and S2 in fusion of viral cellular membrane. Unlike coronavirus confess a miscellaneous of protease and entry receptor, where SARS Cov and SARS Cov2 processes their S Protein by utilizing cellular serine protease TMPRSS2 and consecutive interaction with angiotensin converting enzyme two cellular receptor.

 

Globally, there have been huge number of cases reported by world health organization. Worldwide there are 139, 501, 934 cases was confirmed and 29, 92,193 related death noticed on 14 April 2021as per WHO report. A few year back, for controlling pandemic of Ebola virus, randomized trial are performed. But that time also many patient not cured.12 The scientist are disinclined the past mistakes into these current situations. The researchers from all over the countries try to find out therapeutically effective medicines to combat against novel coronavirus but still there is no any distinct medicines discovered to fight against these novel coronavirus. Many scientist from different countries have studied the effect of miscellaneous drugs on covid 19 patients. The drugs such as antiviral, antibacterial, antimalarial, anti-immunity boosters, anticoagulants also studied. Some of the scientist also conducted research on covalescent plasma therapy.

 

In these narrative review article we summarizes the current pharmacological drug which shows greatest therapeutic activity with safety and efficacy with less adverse effect against novel coronavirus. These information may helpful to identify the specific treatment of covid 19 disease.

 

Clinically used pharmacotherapy of covid 19 disease:

1. Antiviral drugs:

Remdesivir:

Remdesivir (veklory) was the first drugs approved by the food and drug administrations for treating the SARS Cov2 virus. Remdesivir is a prodrug of the adenosine triphosphate analogue, with potential antiviral activity against a variety of virus. It is an antiviral nucleotide analogue used for therapy of severe novel coronavirus disease 2019 (covid 19) caused by SARS Cov2 infection.

 

Remdesivir therapy is given by IV route of administration for 5 -10 days and is frequently accompanied by transient reversible, mild to moderate elevation in serum aminotransferases levels but has been only rarely linked to instances of clinically liver injury, its hepatic effect being over shadowed by the systematic effect of covid 1913

 

Remdesivir has been studied in several clinical trials for the treatment of covid 19.the trial was carried out on 453 patients in the two group of remdesivir and placebo designed for 28 days. The dose is 200mg in 350ml normal saline infused IV over approximately 30-60 min for the first day and 100mg in 250ml normal saline for 9 days.14

 

On the May 1, 2020, the FDA provided use for remdesivir as the treatment of hospitalized covid 19 patients. Recently it was noted that for mild or moderate covid 19 patients, remdesivir not recommended. Remedesivir effectively inhibited SARS Cov2 infected vero cells in vitro study15. Early administration of remdesivir showed a significant reduction in viral load in bronchoalveolar lauage compared to the vehicle and also decrease the pulmonary infiltrates in SARS Cov 2 infection of these macaque model. It demonstrate both antiviral as well as clinical effect.16 Remdesivir found to be a potent inhibitor of SARS Cov2 replication in human nasal and bronchial airways epithelial cells.17

 

Adverse effect of remdesivir:

Common adverse event noted use of remdesivir in patients with covid 19 include rash, diarrhoea, hypotension, abnormal liver function and renal impairement. Serious adverse event (acute kidney injury, septic shock) noted 23 %.18.

 

General structure of remdesivir:

 

Favipiravir:

Favipiravir is a purine nucleotide analogue included instead og guanine and adenine. Favipiravir is a prodrug which when administered into human body, it get metabolized into its active form favipiravir-ribofuranosyl-5’-triphosphate (favipiravir-RTP).19 Favipiravir is administered in two forms: oral and intravenous. In japan, favipiravir was developed for treatment of resistant influenza virus and also other infections. The Toyoma chemical from Japan country, manufactured and developed favipiravir and get approved to use for medicinal purpose 20. In 2019, its patent is over and it comes under category of generic drugs.

 

The clinical trials on favipiravir was conducted in Shenzhen. Initially 80 patients get selected and it observed that chest x ray imaging recovered at higher level (62%) and viral clearance time get reduced (91.43%) (21). Afterwards study was going on 120 patients, in that efficacy with 7 days clinical improvement rate of 71.43% and decreased cough and pyrexia.22

 

Favipiravir is a broad spectrum antiviral drugs with evidence based research on its efficacy of antiviral activity in several human RNA virus like Nipah virus, Influenza virus, Ebola virus, lassa virus, and rebies.23,24,25 The favipiravir prevent viral transcription and replication by binding of active form of favipiravir that is favipiravir-RTP to the RNA dependent RNA polymerase (RdRp) and inhibit it.26

 

In these mechanism, the incorporation of favipiravir-RTP into a newly formed RNA strand,27 preventing its elongation and proliferation of viral genome. The competitive binding of RNA dependent RNA polymerase by the favipiravir-RTP and purine nucleosides which ultimately affects viral replication and transcription. 28,29

 

The review study suggested that rate of viral clearance is much faster than in umifenovir and lopinavir/Ritonavir 30,31. The favipiravir was became almost potential drug treatment for covid 19 patients due to resemblance of RNA structure of SARS Cov2 with SARS Cov.32

 

General structure of favipiravir:

 

2. Antibiotics:

Azithromycin:

To moderate patients UN agency took HCQ alone or with azithromycin. A study on 1061 patients in France, during which a gaggle of patients received HCQ and azithromycin, showed that the employment of those medication may be safe once the complications of COVID-19 failed to occur within the patients. During this case, a discount in mortality occurred within the patients. Azithromycin is an antibiotic derived from the macrolide Pediamycin. This antibiotic has shown higher performance than Pediamycin against gram-positive and gram-negative pathogens. In one study, the connection was investigated between macrolides and mortality in MERS-CoV patients. 33 The results showed no important relationship between macrolide treatment within the patients and reduced mortality. 34

 

However, the treatment of COVID-19 patients with azithromycin cannot be avoided as a result of the amount of studies with similar results is tiny. Azithromycin has been employed in several reports examining the consequences of HCQ 35. In a very study on eighty patients, azithromycin and HCQ were wont to treat COVID-19 that considerably reduced the microorganism load within the patients 36. Within the us, a retrospective study was going on the history of hospitalized patients with COVID-19.

 

Mortality was lower within the cluster receiving HCQ using azithromycin than within the cluster receiving HCQ alone. In another study, the employment of HCQ with azithromycin was involved in reducing the mortality of COVID-19 patients 37. what is more, adding azithromycin to the medication program of patients taking HCQ and LPV-RTV improved the overall condition of the COVID-19 patients.

 

In a systematic study victimisation meta-analysis, there was no important distinction between HCQ recipients and also the management group; but, in some cases, HCQ in conjunction with azithromycin reduced the progression of respiratory organ illness. 38 In 5 studies, the employment of each HCQ and azithromycin was related to improved outcomes.yet, in a very controlled trial, COVID-19 patients were treated with HCQ alone or with azithromycin. 39,40 Compared to the management cluster, no improvement in clinical standing was discovered in delicate

 

Teicoplanin:

In 2016, a study begin that glycopeptide antibiotics were applicable for diseases like infective agent viral infection, SARS-CoV, and MERS-CoV due to their low toxicity.(41,42) In another study, teicoplanin functioned as Associate in Nursing matter of infectious agent virus infection to advance the healing method(43) . In reality, teicoplanin inhibits the virus entry by inhibiting cathepsin L Teicoplanin, that's related for infectious cases, was suggested in degree very study for COVID-19 treatment. However, the role of teicoplanin in inhibiting novel coronavirus remains to be processed. 44

 

The SARS-COV-2 Infecton Cycle:

Angiotensin-converting catalyst a pair of (ACE2) may be a cellular receptor expressed within the lungs, arteries, heart, kidneys, and also the internal organ. ACE2 binds to the infective agent (S) supermolecule and constitutes the cellular entry receptor for SARS-CoV-2 into their human host 45 additional specifically, the super molecule is cleaved into 2 subunits, S1 and S2, by Associate in nursing living thing proteinase. Whereas S1 binds to ACE2, S2 is any cleaved and activated by the host surface-associated transmembrane proteinase aminoalkanoic acid a pair of (TMPRSS2)46. Along these actions end in host-viral membrane fusion and also the unless of the ribonucleic acid order into the host cell protoplasm47,48. Firstly, the host travel machinery is hijacked for the interpretation of the polyproteins and also the essential infective agent proteases.49 The polyproteins (pp1a and pp1ab) square measure cleaved into sixteen non-structural effector proteins by 3CLpro and PLpro permitting them to create the replication complicated along with the ribonucleic acid-dependent RNA enzyme, that synthesizes a full-length negative ribonucleic acid strand templet50,51 this is often wont to replicate the whole ribonucleic acid order and generate the individual sub-genomic template RNA templates required for the interpretation of the infective agent structural and accent proteins 52. The freshly synthesized structural and accent proteins square measure then trafficked from the ER through the Golgi body, when that new virions assemble in budding Golgi body when that new virions square measure exocytosed and free from the host cell into the encompassing atmosphere to repeat the infection cycle.53,54

 

Indian medicinal plants against covid 19:

1. Nigella sativa (black cumin):

Nigella sativa L.’s bioactive compounds are saw as potential inhibitors of COVID-19 in molecular arrival studies. Nigellidine provided energy advanced at situation (6LU7) with energy scores nighest to antimalarial and higher than anti-inflammatory and favipiravir whereas α-hederin gave energy advanced at the situation (2GTB) with energy scores higher than antimalarial, anti-inflammatory, and favipiravir 55. The alcoholic seed extract has shown immunological disorder activity on a phyto hemaglutinin and immune stimulating result on non-phyto hemagglutinin (PHA) stirred proliferation 56. The thymoquinone -rich oil showed suppression of protein sign molecules, and PGE2 in T-lymphocytes moreover as increased PGE2 unleash in adreno carcinomic human alveolar basal animal tissue A549.57

 

2. Linium Ussitatissium (flax seed):

Hetero polysaccharide, extracted from flax seed hull obsessed immune modulatory activity and anti-hepatitis B virus potential. It suggestively aroused mRNA expression of TNF-α, NO and IL exhibiting immune responses in murine macrophages. Antiviral activity has been rumored through inhibition of expression of surface matter moreover as wrap matter and conjointly interfered with DNA replication. The study urged its promising potential as associate immune stimulant and immunogens adjuvant 58. It showed medicine and immune modulatory potential in obesity-associated endocrine resistance. Its oil in co-culture with 3T3-L1 adipocytes-RAW 264.7 macrophages of C57BL/6 mice rumored shifting the cytokines toward medicine with a decrement in TNF-α. Immunomodulation has been determined through a rise in levels of Th2-related protein (IL-4), bodily fluid anti-ova IgG1, and IgE, and a decrease in Th-1 connected cytokines (TNF-α and IFN-γ) and anti-ova immunoglobulin levels 59. Another study rumored the immune modulatory activity of phenoplast parts of flax seed principally through reduction in cell-mediated immune responses60.

 

3. Withania Somnifera (ashwagandha):

Multiple studies have established that Ashwagandha has antiviral and immune modulatory potential. terribly recently, associate in silico study complete that Withaferin-A exhibits antiviral potential against SARS-CoV-2 through inhibiting ribonucleic acid enzyme with higher separation energy than anti-inflammatory and different medication used against SARS-CoV-2. Another study on withan one showed blockage of SARS-CoV–2 entry and conjointly its subsequent infection by interrupting electricity interactions between the RBD and ACE261. Grover and colleagues through molecular arrival reportable the potential of withaferin A against HSV through inhibition of deoxyribonucleic acid enzyme protein62. W. somnifera molecular mechanism has been elucidated by exploitation network ethnopharmacological technique and reportable that withanolide-phytosterol combination may be a smart immunomodulator63. W. somnifera formulation (supplemented with minerals) has been reportable to enhance each cellular and body substance immunity further as medical specialty profile additionally to the numerous inhibition in mouse splenocytes64. Liquid root extract of W. somnifera attenuates production of pro-inflammatory cytokines and transcription think about collagen-induced inflammatory disease65. A study in 2018 showed that W. somnifera considerably stifled RNA expression of inflammatory proteins and promotes the RNA expression of the medicine cytokine in HaCaT cells66.

 

CONCLUSION:

This review aimed to current treatment choices in combating SARS-CoV-2. Based on several aspects, it may be complete that remdesivir and anti-inflammatory with or while not azithromycine ar still treatment choices for COVID-19 patients within the gentle to moderate stages of the malady. The World Health Oraganization declared the novel coronavirus happening.” a public health emergency of international concern” on January thirty. On March eleven,2020after sustained unfold of the malady outside of china, and currently round the World, will hopefully blunt the spread of the virus whereas treatment and a vaccinum are developed to prevent it.

 

REFERENCES:

1.      J.F. Chan et al,, S.K. Lau, K.K.. To, V.C. Cheng, P.C. Woo, K.Y. Yuen. Middle east respiratory syndrome coronavirus zoonotic betacoronavirus causing SARS – like disease. Clin Microbial Rev,28 (2015),pp.465-522..

2.      N.P. Johnson et al, J. Muller Updating the accounts: global mortality of the 1918-1920 “Spanish” influenza pandemic.105-115.

3.      Wu, Y. Peng, B. Huang, X. Ding, X. Wang, P. Niu, et al. Genome composition and divergence of the novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV) originating in China Cell Host Microbe, 27 (2020), pp. 325-329

4.      Y. Yin, R.G. Wunderink MERS, SARS and other coronaviruses as causes of pneumonia Respirology, 23 (2018), pp. 130-137.

5.      C.B. Reusken, B.L. Haagmans, M.A. Muller, C. Gutierrez, G.J. Godeke, B. Meyr, et al. Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus neutralising serum antibodies in dromedary camels: a comparative serological lancet,356-359

6.      Zou L, Ruan F, Huang M, et al. SARS-CoV-2 viral load in upper respiratory specimens of infected patients. N Engl J Med. 2020. 10.1056/NEJMc2001737. [PMC free article] [PubMed]

7.      Coronavirus: https://www.who.int/emergencies/mers-cov/en/. Accessed 16 Feb 2020.

8.      World Health Organization. Situation reports. Available at: https://www.who.int/emergencies/diseases/novel-coronavirus-2019/situation-reports/. Accessed 22 Feb 2020.

9.      Coronavirus Outbreak. Available at: https://www.worldometers.info/coronavirus/. Accessed 23 Feb 2020

10.   Richman DD, Whitley RJ, Hayden FG. Clinical Virology, 4th ed. Washington: ASM Press; 2016.

11.   Chan-Yeung M, Xu RH. SARS: epidemiology. Respirology. 2003; 8:S9–14. doi: 10.1046/j.1440-1843.2003.00518.x.

12.   Middle East Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus. Available at: https://www.who.int/emergencies/mers-cov/en/. Accessed 16 Feb 2020.

13.   Pubchem.ncbi.nim.nih.gov.

14.   Y. Zhou,F .Zhang, D.. Zhao, Cheng, Z. Gao, l2020. Evaluation of the efficacy and safety of IV remdesivir in adult patient with severe pneumonia caused by cov-19 virus infection .htttps//doi.org/10.1186/s13063-020-04352.9

15.   Wang M, Caor, Zhang L, Yang X ,Liu J..Xu M. Remdesvir and chloroquin effectively inhibit the recently emerged novel corona virus (2019-nCov) in vitro.

16.   Williasmson B.N, Feldmann f., Schwarz B. Clinical benefit of remdesivir in rhesus macqes infected with SARS –COV-2. Pizzorno.A..,padey B.’julien T, characterization and treatment Of SARS-COV-2 in nasal and bronchial human airway epithelia.

17.   Geein J., Ohmagaeri, N., Shin D., Compassionate use of remdesivir for patient with severe cov-19.

18.   Furuta Y., Gowen B.B., Takahashi K., Shiraki K., Smee D.F., Barnard D.L. Favipiravir (T-705), a novel viral RNA polymerase inhibitor. Antivir Res. 2013 Nov; 100:446–454.

19.   Toyama Chemicals. Summary of Product Characteristics of Avigan.

20.   Madelain V., Nguyen T.H., Olivo A. Ebola virus infection: review of the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties of drugs considered for testing in human efficacy trials, Clini Pharmacokinet. 2016 Aug; 55:907–923. doi: 10.1007/s40262-015-0364-1.

21.   Jin Z., Smith L.K., Rajwanshi V.K., Kim B., Deval J. The ambiguous base-pairing and high substrate efficiency of T-705 (favipiravir) ribofuranosyl 5′-triphosphate towards influenza a virus Polymerase PloS One. 2013; 8

22.   Baranovich T., Wong S.S., Armstrong J. 705 (favipiravir) induces lethal mutagenesis in influenza A H1N1 viruses in vitro. J Virol. 2013;87:3741–3751.

23.   Sleeman K., Mishin V.P., Deyde V.M., Furuta Y., Klimov A.I., Gubareva L.V. In vitro antiviral activity of favipiravir (T-705) against drug-resistant influenza and 2009 A(H1N1) viruses. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2010;54:2517–2524.

24.   Oestereich L., Lüdtke A., Wurr S., Rieger T., Muñoz-Fontela C., Günther S. Successful treatment of advanced Ebola virus infection with T-705 (favipiravir) in a small animal model. Antivir Res. 2014 May;105:17–21.

25.   Smither S.J., Eastaugh L.S., Steward J.A., Nelson M., Lenk R.P., Lever M.S. Post-exposure efficacy of oral T-705 (Favipiravir) against inhalational Ebola virus infection in a mouse model. Antivir Res. 2014 Apr;104:153–155.

26.   Sissoko D., Laouenan C., Folkesson E. Experimental treatment with favipiravir for ebola virus disease (the JIKI trial): a historically controlled, single-arm proof-of-concept trial in Guinea. PLoS Med. 2016 Mar 1;13

27.   Kerber R., Lorenz E., Duraffour S. Laboratory findings, compassionate use of favipiravir, and outcome in patients with ebola virus disease, Guinea, 2015-A retrospective observational study. J Infect Dis. 2019 Jun 19;220:195–202.

28.   Shannon A., Selisko B., Le N. bioRxiv; 2020 May 15. Favipiravir Strikes the SARS-CoV-2 at its Achilles Heel, the RNA Polymerase.

29.   Furuta Y., Takahashi K., Fukuda Y. In vitro and in vivo activities of anti-influenza virus compound T-705. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2002;46:977–981.

30.   Nguyen T.H., Guedj J., Anglaret X. Favipiravir pharmacokinetics in Ebola-Infected patients of the JIKI trial reveals concentrations lower than targeted. PLoS Neglected Trop Dis. 2017 Feb 23;11

31.   Wang M., Cao R., Zhang L. Remdesivir and chloroquine effectively inhibit the recently emerged novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV) in vitro. Cell Res. 2020 Mar;30:269–271.

32.   Chen C., Zhang Y., Huang J. medRxiv; 2020. Favipiravir versus Arbidol for COVID-19: A Randomized Clinical Trial. 2020 Apr 15.

33.   Arabi YM, Deeb AM, Al-Hameed F, et al. Macrolides in critically ill patients with Middle East respiratory syndrome. Int J Infect Dis. 2019;81:184–190. doi:10.1016/j.ijid.2019.01.04

34.   Gautret P, Lagier J-C, Parola P, et al. Clinical and microbiological effect of a combination of hydroxychloroquine and azithromycin in 80 COVID-19 patients with at least a six-day follow up: a pilot observational study. Travel Med Infect Dis. 2020;34:101663. doi:10.1016/j.tmaid.2020.101663

35.   Magagnoli J, Narendran S, Pereira F, et al. Outcomes of hydroxychloroquine usage in United States veterans hospitalized with COVID-19. Med. 2020. doi:10.1016/j.medj.2020.06.001

36.   Lagier J-C, Million M, Gautret P, et al. Outcomes of 3737 COVID-19 patients treated with hydroxychloroquine/azithromycin and other regimens in Marseille, France: a retrospective analysis. Travel Med Infect. 2020; 36:101791. doi:10.1016/j.tmaid.2020.101791

37.   Sekhavati E, Jafari F, SeyedAlinaghi S, et al. NSafety and effectiveness of azithromycin in patients with COVID-19: an open-label randomized trial. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2020; 56:106143. doi:10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2020.106143

38.   Sarma P, Kaur H, Kumar H, et al. Virological and clinical cure in COVID-19 patients treated with hydroxychloroquine: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Med Virol. 2020; 92:776–785. doi:10.1002/jmv.25898

39.   Cavalcanti AB, Zampieri FG, Rosa RG, et al. Hydroxychloroquine with or without azithromycin in to-moderate Covid-19. N Engl J Med. 2020. Doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2019014

40.   Million M, Lagier J-C, Gautret P, et al. Early treatment of COVID-19 patients with hydroxychloroquine and azithromycin: a retrospective analysis of 1061 cases in Marseille, France. Travel Med Infect Wang Y, Cui R, Li G, et al. Teicoplanin inhibits Ebola pseudovirus infection in cell culture. Antiviral Res. 2016; 125:1–7. doi:10.1016/j.antiviral.2015.11.003

41.   Wang Y, Cui R, Li G, et al. Teicoplanin inhibits Ebola pseudovirus infection in cell culture. Antiviral Res. 2016; 125:1–7. doi:10.1016/j.antiviral.2015.11.003

42.   Zhou N, Pan T, Zhang J, et al. Glycopeptide antibiotics potently inhibit cathepsin L in the late endosome/lysosome and block the entry of ebola virus, Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus (MERS-CoV), and severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus (SARS-CoV). J Biol Chem. 2016; 291:9218–9232. doi:10.1074/jbc.M116.716100

43.   Baron SA, Devaux C, Colson P, Raoult D, Rolain J-M. Teicoplanin: an alternative drug for the tratment of COVID-19? Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2020;55:105944.doi:10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2020.105944

44.   Wang Z-H, Shu C, Ran X, Xie C-H, Zhang L. Critically Ill patients with coronavirus disease 2019 in a designated ICU: clinical Features and Predictors for mortality. Risk Manag Healthc Policy. 2020; 13:833–845. doi:10.2147/RMHP.S263095 Dis. 2020; 35:101738. doi:10.1016/j.tmaid.2020.

45.   Liu, C. et al. 2020. Research and Development of Therapeutic Agents and Vaccines for COVID-19 and Related Human Coronavirus Diseases. ACS Central Science 6, 315-331.

46.   Guo, Y.R. et al. 2020. The origin, transmission and clinical therapies on coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) outbreak - an update on the status. Mil Med Res 7, 11.

47.   Yin, Y. & Wunderink, R.G. 2018. MERS, SARS and other coronaviruses as causes of pneumonia. Respirology 23, 130-137.

48.   Cui, J. et al. 2019. Origin and evolution of pathogenic coronaviruses. Nat Rev Microbiol 17, 181-192.

49.   Zhu, N. et al. 2020. A Novel Coronavirus from Patients with Pneumonia in China, 2019. N Engl J Med 382, 727-733.

50.   Fehr, A.R. & Perlman, S. 2015. Coronaviruses: an overview of their replication and pathogenesis. Methods Mol Biol 1282, 1-23.
Zhou, P. et al. 2020. A pneumonia outbreak associated with a new coronavirus of probable bat origin. Nature 579, 270-273.

51.   Hoffmann, M. et al. 2020. SARS-CoV-2 Cell Entry Depends on ACE2 and TMPRSS2 and Is Blocked by a Clinically Proven Protease Inhibitor. Cell

52.   Li, G. et al. 2020. Coronavirus infections and immune responses. J Med Virol 92, 424-432

53.   Salim, B., and Noureddine, M. (2020). Identification of compounds from nigella sativa as new potential inhibitors of 2019 novel coronasvirus (Covid-19): molecular docking study. chemRxiv:10.26434/chemrxiv.12055716.v1.

54.   lshatwi, A. A. (2014). Bioactivity-guided identification to delineate the immunomodulatory effects of methanolic extract of Nigella sativa seed on human peripheral blood mononuclear cells. Chin. J. Integr. Med. [Epub ahead of print]. Doi: 10.1007/s11655-013-1534-3

55.   Koshak, A. E., Yousif, N. M., Fiebich, B. L., Koshak, E. A., and Heinrich, M. (2018). Comparative immunomodulatory activity of Nigella sativa L. preparations on proinflammatory mediators: a focus on asthma. Front. Pharmacol. 9, 1075. Doi: 10.3389/fphar.

56.   Liang, S., Li, X., Ma, X., Li, A., Wang, Y., Reaney, M. J. T., et al. (2019). A flaxseed heteropolysaccharide stimulates immune responses and inhibits hepatitis B virus. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 136, 230–240. doi:10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2019.06.076.

57.   Palla, A. H., Khan, N. A., Bashir, S., Ur-Rehman, N., Iqbal, J., and Gilani, A. H. (2015). Pharmacological basis for the medicinal use of Linum usitatissimum (Flaxseed) in infectious and non-infectious diarrhea. J. Ethnopharmacol. 160, 61–68. doi:10.1016/j.jep.2014.11.030

58.   Kasote, D. M., Zanwar, A. A., Devkar, S. T., Hegde, M. V., and Deshmukh, K. K. (2012). Immunomodulatory activity of ether insoluble phenolic components of n-butanol fraction (EPC-BF) of flaxseed in rat. Asian Pac. J. Trop. Biomed. 2 (2), S623–S626. doi:10.1016/S2221-1691(12)60285-8

59.   Balkrishna, A., Pokhrel, S., Singh, J., and Varshney, A. (2020). Withanone from withania somnifera may inhibit novel coronavirus (COVID-19) entry by disrupting interactions between viral S-protein receptor binding domain and host ACE2 receptor. Virol. J. [Epub ahead of print]. doi:10.21203/RS.3.RS-17806/V1.

60.   Grover, A., Agrawal, V., Shandilya, A., Bisaria, V. S., and Sundar, D. (2011). Non-nucleosidic inhibition of Herpes simplex virus DNA polymerase: mechanistic insights into the anti-herpetic mode of action of herbal drug withaferin A. BMC Bioinf. 12 (Suppl 13), S22. doi:10.1186/1471-2105-12-S13-S22

61.   Chandran, U., and Patwardhan, B. (2017). Network ethnopharmacological evaluation of the immunomodulatory activity of Withania somnifera. J. Ethnopharmacol. 197, 250–256. doi:10.1016/j.jep.2016.07.080

 

 

Received on 08.01.2022       Modified on 19.01.2022

Accepted on 24.01.2022      ©A&V Publications All right reserved

Research J. Science and Tech. 2022; 14(1):66-72.

DOI: 10.52711/2349-2988.2022.00010